CBC: TDC_ARTICLE_START As the number of high-profile online consumer security breaches continues to grow, the federal government is expected to introduce a bill soon to shake up Canada's privacy laws — possibly as early as this week. Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains signalled plans to introduce the legislation late last week on the House of Commons notice paper. TDC_ARTICLE_STOP Wait, we have an "Innovation Minister"? And his name is Navdeep Bains? As with everything about Joffrey Trudeau, I really can't figure out if this is funny or enraging. I have to admit I'm a little bit thunderstruck. TDC_ARTICLE_START he bill — officially called "An Act to enact the Consumer Privacy Protection Act and the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other Acts" — would be the first major attempt to change Canada's privacy law in decades. Details of the bill won't be available until the legislation is tabled, but a spokesperson for Bains pointed to the promises outlined in the minister's mandate letter. That letter — essentially the minister's marching orders from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — tasked him with drafting a "digital charter" that would include legislation to give Canadians "appropriate compensation" when their personal data is breached. It also promised to introduce new regulations for large digital companies to better protect Canadians' personal data and encourage more competition in the digital marketplace, and to appoint a new data commissioner to oversee those regulations. "It will be significant and meaningful to make it very clear that privacy is important. Compensation, of course, is one aspect of it," Bains said back in January, adding that the government also wants "to demonstrate to businesses very clearly that there are going to be significant penalties for non-compliance with the law. That's really my primary goal." The letter also calls for "enhanced powers for the Privacy Commissioner." The office of Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien — who has been calling for more powers — said he will be briefed on the bill after it's tabled. "Our office has long been calling for federal privacy laws better suited to protecting Canadians in the digital age," said Therrien's spokesperson Vito Pilieci. "We need a legal framework that allows for responsible innovation that serves the public interest and is likely to foster trust, but prohibits the use of technology in ways that are incompatible with our rights and values. The law should also provide for enforcement mechanisms that ensure individuals have access to quick and effective remedies for the protection of their privacy rights, and create incentives for broad compliance by organizations." TDC_ARTICLE_STOP If this sounds vague, it certainly is. My prediction is that the "increased powers for the Privacy Commissioner," are going to be used to do more oppression of regular people, and have absolutely nothing to do with giving people more privacy and security from Corporations. But really, you can just assume that anything that sounds good but also vague is complete horseshit. I haven't been wrong yet. Skipping ahead a little. TDC_ARTICLE_START B.C. Information and Privacy Commissioner Michael McEvoy said the commissioners likely would have pursued fines against the company, Cadallic Fairview, if they'd had the power. "Fines in a case like this would have been a consideration. It is an incredible shortcoming of Canadian law," he said. "We as privacy regulators don't have any authority to levy fines on companies that violate peoples' personal information and that should really change." TDC_ARTICLE_STOP Also, do people want corporations who violate our privacy to be fined? I think we would like them to be frogmarched to jail, or put in stocks in front of the town, so we can throw rotting fruit at them. That last one sounds quite fun! TDC_ARTICLE_START Statistics Canada says that about 57 per cent of Canadians online reported experiencing a cyber security incident in 2018. Bains's mandate letter also hints at the introduction of a so-called "right to be forgotten" or "right to erasure" law by calling for the "ability to withdraw, remove and erase basic personal data from a platform." TDC_ARTICLE_STOP What the fuck is a "cyber security incident"? Apparently it's something I should know about, since there's a better than 50% chance I've experienced one. Or they are using an absurdly broad definition of this to push something else through. TDC_ARTICLE_START Conservative MP James Cumming, the party's innovation, science and industry critic, said he'll be reading it closely to make sure it protects Canadians' privacy without being unreasonable for small businesses. "Canada's Conservatives will always stand up for the privacy of Canadians. When it comes to Liberal legislation, the devil is always in the details," he said in a statement. "Conservatives will review the legislation to ensure that it protects privacy without imposing burdensome regulations on small businesses who are struggling to keep their doors open during the second wave of the pandemic." TDC_ARTICLE_STOP This might be the angle here. Get the Donor-Right to remove anything that could possibly benefit ordinary people, therefore just getting what they want. Typical strategy the Donor Parties do, and I think that could be the shot. But really, the whole thing is just so vague, that I feel more confused after reading the article multiple times over than before.